CO₂ is the lifeblood of greenhouse cultivation. However, relying on a fossil fuel-based supply chain is an increasingly fragile strategy. As energy prices swing and sustainability pressure grows, more growers are asking how they can take control of their own CO₂ supply.
Green Gas & Liquids will address exactly this question at GreenTech Amsterdam. Our Business Development Manager, Nicola Donato, will join a panel titled “How Can Greenhouses Store CO2 and Take Control of Their Supply?” alongside Janneke Grit (Wageningen University & Research), Peter van Hooft (Skytree), and Henry Gordon-Smith (Agritecture). Together, they’ll explore how greenhouse operators can move toward an independent, circular CO₂ strategy.
Three Ways to Supply and Store CO2 in Greenhouses
Growers generally choose between three approaches, and each comes with real trade-offs.
Direct use of flue gas requires no capture unit, but it isn’t storable. It also carries a low CO₂ purity of just 4–6% by volume, so growers must handle roughly 16.7 times the gas volume of pure CO₂ to deliver the same enrichment.
Gas CO2 storage, by contrast, achieves over 99.9% purity. It stores in a flexible tank footprint of around 12×12m and works with any energy source — not just CHP or gas boilers.
Liquid CO2 storage delivers the same high purity in a far more compact footprint, roughly 2×2m. Nevertheless, liquefaction introduces significant cost. It requires 250 kWh per tonne of CO₂ liquefied, plus continuous energy draw to maintain tank pressure. As a result, total delivered OPEX for liquid CO₂ can reach €180–220 per tonne — up to 10 times the cost of on-site gaseous CO₂ capture.
Why Timing Your CO2 Capture Matters
Electricity prices fluctuate sharply across the day, and this directly affects when CO2 capture makes the most sense. During solar surplus hours (roughly 09:00–17:00), prices often drop to zero because of high PV output. This is precisely when a CHP can run purely for CO₂ recovery — generating up to 1,400 kg/hour without the pressure of unfavorable power prices.
Over 180 summer days, this strategy can capture more than 2,000 tonnes of CO₂ annually. Depending on your cost baseline, that translates into savings of €200,000–€300,000 per year. Meanwhile, during evening peak hours, when prices can spike above €370/MWh, the same CHP becomes far more valuable for electricity and heat production instead.
Galloxol CCU: Practical Greenhouse CO2 Storage
This is exactly where Galloxol® CCU comes in. Unlike traditional amine-based carbon capture, Galloxol® uses a biodegradable solvent with no toxic chemicals and no loss of solvent to atmosphere. It’s specifically designed for greenhouse use, and it delivers meaningful savings: roughly 40% lower CAPEX and 120% lower OPEX than liquefaction-based alternatives.
The system scales modularly from 0.5 to 6 tonnes of CO₂ production per hour, so it adapts to greenhouses of different sizes. Two operating installations demonstrate this in practice. In Vienna, Austria, a 1.8 ton/hour Galloxol® plant captures and reuses CO₂ across 7 hectares of greenhouses. In Egchel, the Netherlands, a 2.2 ton/hour installation has been supporting horticulture operations since 2021.
Curious how Galloxol® CCU could work for your greenhouse? Contact our team to discuss your CO2 strategy.
News
Related articles
These articles related to "Greenhouse CO₂ Storage: How to Take Control of Your Supply" might interest you.
- CO₂ Capture for Greenhouses Without Liquefaction — How Galloxol® Changes the Economics
- CO₂ afvang uit biomassaketel in de kas: hoe DES Sirjansland het verschil maakt
- CO₂ capture from a biomass boiler in the greenhouse: lessons from DES Sirjansland
- On Stage at Fruit Logistica 2026- Berlin
- CO₂ capture for a greenhouse in Vienna: Merschl Gartenbau achieves biogenic CO₂ self-sufficiency
- CO₂ Capture for Horticulture at SIVAL 2026
News
You might also like these articles
CO₂ afvang uit biomassaketel in de kas: hoe DES Sirjansland het verschil maakt
Eigen CO₂ afvang uit een biomassaketel: bewezen in de tomatenkas In de glastuinbouw staat CO₂ doseren centraal. Meer CO₂ betekent meer groei, hogere opbrengst en een betere benutting van licht. Maar de beschikbaarheid van betaalbare, schone CO₂ staat steeds meer onder druk. WKK’s draaien minder uren, industriële CO₂ dreigt schaarser te worden, en de kosten
Read article
CO₂ capture from a biomass boiler in the greenhouse: lessons from DES Sirjansland
For greenhouse growers, CO₂ is not a luxury — it is a production input as essential as water and light. Yet reliable, affordable access to CO₂ is becoming harder to secure. CHP units are running fewer hours, industrial CO₂ supplies are under pressure, and the cost of delivered liquid CO₂ continues to rise. For a
Read article
Calculator
Calculate your expected CO2 decarbonization
"*" indicates required fields